Welcome to www.ClimateCheck.org This is an independent UK based website
established to help evaluate and disseminate sound scientific
information on climate change and its causes, as a guide to the public
and policymakers. The site further seeks to draw attention
to inappropriate policies which are not based on science. You may
add your comments or questions in the
discussion forum.
The Real Global Warming Disaster
Is the obsession with 'climate change' turning out to be
the most costly scientific blunder in history? by Christopher Booker
(published by Continuum International Publishing Group in
October 2009)
This book tells
the whole
story in a unemotional but factual and easy to read style with all
sources of information shown in appendices. It shows how
politicians are badly informed concerning the science and the extremely
costly decisions that have been made. It is easy to read and would
be a good book to read first - strongly recommended. Please add your review in the Forum.
Prof Ian Plimer, a
geologist at Adelaide University, hit the headlines in Britain on
Thursday, giving an interview in which he claimed that "not one
great climate change in the past has actually been driven by carbon
dioxide". So what are his key thoughts on the issue?
Heaven and Earth: Global Warming - The
Missing Science
by Ian Plimer
(published by Taylor Trade Publishing in July 2009 - paperback)
This
book takes the reader through the science behind climate change with
less emphasis on the politics of recent developments. It
covers history going back to ice ages, sea current systems,
volcanoes, the atmosphere and has an excellent chapter on the sun.
Contains over 2300 references to studies and other authoritative
sources. It is strongly recommended. Please add your
review in the Forum.
Roy Spencer ,
Ph. D. climatologist, author, former NASA scientist
""... And now my old boss
when I was at NASA (as well as James Hansen’s old boss), John Theon, has
stated very clearly that he doesn’t believe global warming is
manmade…and adding “climate models are useless” for good measure. Even I
wouldn’t go quite that far, since I use simple ones in my
published research." Apart from the
blog this
website has
Latest Global Temperatures and several other interesting reports.
Compare daily Arctic sea ice - satellite images showing
percentage concentration for dates entered (The Cryosphere Today)
An Appeal to Reason: A Cool Look At Global
Warming by Nigel Lawson
(published by Duckworth in April 2008) - see
Forum for more details
- strongly recommended.
Please add your review in the Forum.
Is the earth getting warmer, or cooler?
A tale of two thermometers
By Steven Goddard - posted in Science 2 May 2008
Solar activity 'not behind climate change'
3 April 2008
The research,
carried out by physicists at Lancaster University, undermines claims by
climate sceptics that cosmic rays are key drivers in cloudiness and
temperature. The theory claims that variation in solar activity leads to
a corresponding variance in cosmic rays.
Article
Full report For comments see
discussion forum See also
Cloud
Proposals
NYC Climate Conference Further Debunks ‘Consensus’ Claims
Climate Skeptics Reveal
‘Horror Stories’ of Scientific Suppression
Written by George Landrith - Tuesday, 11 March 2008
Scientists skeptical of man-made climate fears meeting at the 2008
International Conference on Climate Change in New York City described
the “absolute horror stories” about how some scientific journals have
engaged in “outrageous and unethical behaviour” in attempting to suppress
them from publishing their work in peer-reviewed journals. The March 2-4
groundbreaking conference, which featured about 100 speakers with over
500 people attending, presented the report of a team of international
scientists who formed a group to counter the UN IPCC.
The event, which garnered significant international and U.S. media
attention, featured many current and former UN IPCC scientists from
around the world. The international climate conference built on the
momentum of growing number of skeptics as the conference showcased a new
report by a team of international scientists who formed a group to
counter the UN IPCC called the “Nongovernmental International Panel of
Climate Change” (NIPCC). The skeptical scientist report was titled
“Nature, Not Human Activity, Rules the Climate.”
Key findings of the
NIPCC’s climate findings:
(1) Most of climate change is caused by natural forces.
(2) The human contribution is not significant.
(3) Solar-activity changes are the main cause of climate change.
Climate Scientist Dr. S. Fred Singer, former director the US Weather
Satellite Service and past vice chairman of the U.S. National Advisory
Committee on Oceans and Atmosphere, told the conference that the IPCC
“chose to ignore these facts, because they conflicted with the
conclusion that global warming is anthropogenic (man-made).
PDF version of the study:
Nature, Not Human Activity, Rules the Climate
“Global warming has stopped,” said
David
Whitehouse, former science editor for the BBC. “It’s not a viewpoint or
a skeptic’s inaccuracy. It’s an observational fact.” But the
observational fact matters little to global warming alarmists,
particularly those in the media.
|
Over 400 Prominent Scientists Disputed Man-Made Global
Warming in 2007
Written by Senate Environment and Public Works Committee [USA]
Friday, 21 December 2007Over 400 prominent scientists from
more than two dozen countries recently voiced significant
objections to major aspects of the so-called "consensus" on
man-made global warming. These scientists, many of whom are
current and former participants in the UN IPCC
(Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), criticized the
climate claims made by the UN IPCC and former Vice President Al
Gore.
Finland: Dr. Boris Winterhalter, retired Senior Marine
Researcher of the Geological Survey of Finland and former
professor of marine geology at University of Helsinki,
criticized the media for what he considered its alarming climate
coverage. “The effect of solar winds on cosmic radiation has
just recently been established and, furthermore, there seems to
be a good correlation between cloudiness and variations in the
intensity of cosmic radiation. Here we have a mechanism which is
a far better explanation to variations in global climate than
the attempts by IPCC to blame it all on anthropogenic input of
greenhouse gases. “
Britain: Dr. Richard Courtney, a UN IPCC expert reviewer
and a UK-based climate and atmospheric science consultant: “To
date, no convincing evidence for AGW (anthropogenic global
warming) has been discovered. And recent global climate behavior
is not consistent with AGW model predictions.”
The full article
|